Developer Tools Accessibility Conformance Report

This report lists each accessibility rule and how well Developer Tools meets it. Across all rules and product areas there are 28 “Supports”, 17 “Partially Supports”, 26 “Does Not Support”, and 18 “Not Applicable” ratings. The remarks column explains each rating. 38 rules have not been evaluated yet.

Product
Developer Tools
Report date
2026-07-10
Last updated
2026-07-10
Based on
VPAT® 2.5 WCAG 2.2 and Revised Section 508 Edition

This Accessibility Conformance Report presents the results of Laserfiche's accessibility evaluation of Developer Tools. Conformance was evaluated against WCAG 2.1 (Level A and AA). Success criteria outside the evaluated scope — including later WCAG 2.2 additions and all Level AAA criteria that were not tested — are listed as "Not Evaluated" rather than assigned an untested rating. The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server portion was additionally evaluated by external suppliers under the DHS Trusted Tester Program. This report consolidates the evaluations of: Developer Console (WCAG 2.1, 2023-03); OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server (WCAG 2.1, 2023-03).

How to read this report

Each table below covers one part of the standard. Every row names one accessibility rule (a “criterion”), shows a conformance level, and explains the rating. The conformance levels mean:

Supports
The functionality of the product has at least one method that meets the criterion without known defects or meets with equivalent facilitation.
Partially Supports
Some functionality of the product does not meet the criterion.
Does Not Support
The majority of product functionality does not meet the criterion.
Not Applicable
The criterion is not relevant to the product.
Not Evaluated
The product has not been evaluated against the criterion. This can only be used in WCAG Level AAA criteria.

How we tested: Manual testing combined with general product knowledge and assistive-technology testing using the NVDA screen reader, plus automated auditing with Google Lighthouse, the WCAG Color Contrast Checker, and the Siteimprove Accessibility Checker.

Table 1: Success Criteria, Level A

Table 1: Success Criteria, Level A — conformance of Developer Tools. Each row lists a criterion, the conformance level, and remarks.
CriteriaConformance levelRemarks and explanations
1.1.1: Non-text Content
  • Web: Supports
  • Web:No remarks.
1.2.1: Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)
  • Web: Not Applicable
  • Web:No audio or video content.
1.2.2: Captions (Prerecorded)
  • Web: Not Applicable
  • Web:No audio or video content.
1.2.3: Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded)
  • Web: Not Applicable
  • Web:No audio or video content.
1.3.1: Info and Relationships
  • Web: Does Not Support
  • Web:OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server: the major text content is not read by a screen reader. Developer Console: some form labels (such as app name/description), information in code blocks (app manifests, access keys), and radio buttons in the create-app modal are not read by a screen reader.
1.3.2: Meaningful Sequence
  • Web: Partially Supports
  • Web:Developer Console: radio buttons (create-key and create-access-key modals) and code blocks (create-access-key and export-manifest modals) cannot be navigated with the Tab key.
1.3.3: Sensory Characteristics
  • Web: Supports
  • Web:No remarks.
1.4.1: Use of Color
  • Web: Supports
  • Web:No remarks.
1.4.2: Audio Control
  • Web: Not Applicable
  • Web:No audio controls are used.
2.1.1: Keyboard
  • Web: Partially Supports
  • Web:Developer Console: some controls cannot be reached by keyboard (or are not highlighted), including the export-manifest copy button, radio buttons in the create-key/create-app modals, and the copy/download buttons in the create-key, create-app, and export-manifest modals.
2.1.2: No Keyboard Trap
  • Web: Supports
  • Web:No remarks.
2.1.4: Character Key Shortcuts
  • Web: Supports
  • Web:No remarks.
2.2.1: Timing Adjustable
  • Web: Does Not Support
  • Web:Developer Console: timing cannot be adjusted on temporal controls such as toasts. The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server has no timed content.
2.2.2: Pause, Stop, Hide
  • Web: Not Applicable
  • Web:No moving, blinking, scrolling, or auto-updating content.
2.3.1: Three Flashes or Below Threshold
  • Web: Supports
  • Web:No remarks.
2.4.1: Bypass Blocks
  • Web: Supports
  • Web:No remarks.
2.4.2: Page Titled
  • Web: Does Not Support
  • Web:OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server: the page title is the company name and is not descriptive. Developer Console: pages are hard to distinguish without a unique identifier such as an app name/id.
2.4.3: Focus Order
  • Web: Supports
  • Web:No remarks.
2.4.4: Link Purpose (In Context)
  • Web: Supports
  • Web:No remarks.
2.5.1: Pointer Gestures
  • Web: Not Applicable
  • Web:No pointer gestures are used.
2.5.2: Pointer Cancellation
  • Web: Not Applicable
  • Web:No action is executed on the down-event of any element.
2.5.3: Label in Name
  • Web: Partially Supports
  • Web:Developer Console: form inputs have text labels but do not use aria-labels. OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server: some elements are missing aria-labels.
2.5.4: Motion Actuation
  • Web: Not Applicable
  • Web:No motion actuation.
3.1.1: Language of Page
  • Web: Does Not Support
  • Web:OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server: the lang attribute of the html element is fixed to "en". The Developer Console supports this criterion.
3.2.1: On Focus
  • Web: Supports
  • Web:No remarks.
3.2.2: On Input
  • Web: Supports
  • Web:No remarks.
3.2.6: Consistent Help
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
3.3.1: Error Identification
  • Web: Does Not Support
  • Web:Developer Console: form errors are not read aloud by a screen reader. The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server requires no user input.
3.3.2: Labels or Instructions
  • Web: Partially Supports
  • Web:Developer Console: form controls are visually labeled but do not use aria-labels. The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server requires no user input.
3.3.7: Redundant Entry
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
4.1.1: Parsing
  • Web: Partially Supports
  • Web:Some element IDs are not unique in both areas.
4.1.2: Name, Role, Value
  • Web: Partially Supports
  • Web:Developer Console: some form fields are not labeled and some buttons lack a text alternative (the overflow button on the app-list page and the app-picker button). The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server exposes name, role, and value for all components.

Back to report contents

Table 2: Success Criteria, Level AA

Table 2: Success Criteria, Level AA — conformance of Developer Tools. Each row lists a criterion, the conformance level, and remarks.
CriteriaConformance levelRemarks and explanations
1.2.4: Captions (Live)
  • Web: Not Applicable
  • Web:No live audio or streaming.
1.2.5: Audio Description (Prerecorded)
  • Web: Not Applicable
  • Web:No pre-recorded audio.
1.3.4: Orientation
  • Web: Supports
  • Web:No remarks.
1.3.5: Identify Input Purpose
  • Web: Supports
  • Web:No remarks.
1.4.3: Contrast (Minimum)
  • Web: Partially Supports
  • Web:Developer Console: some elements do not pass, such as description text in the Create App modal and some disabled button states. OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server: some copyright links and buttons lack the required contrast.
1.4.4: Resize text
  • Web: Partially Supports
  • Web:Developer Console: some UI elements are hidden when zoomed to 200%, such as the "New" button on the Applications page. The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server resizes text to 200% without loss.
1.4.5: Images of Text
  • Web: Supports
  • Web:No remarks.
1.4.10: Reflow
  • Web: Does Not Support
  • Web:Developer Console: most elements are clipped, require horizontal scrolling, or are hidden altogether. OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server: vertical scrolling is not available on the consent page.
1.4.11: Non-text Contrast
  • Web: Partially Supports
  • Web:Developer Console: several elements lack a visual focus indicator (left sidebar buttons, app buttons on the Applications page, the app overflow button, radio buttons, and copy/download buttons on Access Key modals). OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server: the checkbox on the consent page has no visual boundary.
1.4.12: Text Spacing
  • Web: Does Not Support
  • Web:Developer Console: text inputs have text cut off. The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server presents text properly when spacing styles are applied.
1.4.13: Content on Hover or Focus
  • Web: Supports
  • Web:No remarks.
2.4.5: Multiple Ways
  • Web: Supports
  • Web:No remarks.
2.4.6: Headings and Labels
  • Web: Supports
  • Web:No remarks.
2.4.7: Focus Visible
  • Web: Partially Supports
  • Web:Developer Console: several controls lack a visible focus indicator (see 1.4.11). OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server: some text blocks do not receive focus during keyboard navigation, so focus is not visible.
2.4.11: Focus Not Obscured (Minimum)
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
2.5.7: Dragging Movements
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
2.5.8: Target Size (Minimum)
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
3.1.2: Language of Parts
  • Web: Not Applicable
  • Web:Each page uses a single language at a time.
3.2.3: Consistent Navigation
  • Web: Supports
  • Web:No remarks.
3.2.4: Consistent Identification
  • Web: Partially Supports
  • Web:Developer Console: some dialog buttons are inconsistent on the Applications page. The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server is single-page (not applicable there).
3.3.3: Error Suggestion
  • Web: Does Not Support
  • Web:Developer Console: form errors are not read aloud by a screen reader (see 3.3.1). The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server requires no user input.
3.3.4: Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data)
  • Web: Not Applicable
  • Web:No legal, financial, or other sensitive data.
3.3.8: Accessible Authentication (Minimum)
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
4.1.3: Status Messages
  • Web: Partially Supports
  • Web:Developer Console: error messages are not announced (see 3.3.1). The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server has no status messages.

Back to report contents

Table 3: Success Criteria, Level AAA

Table 3: Success Criteria, Level AAA — conformance of Developer Tools. Each row lists a criterion, the conformance level, and remarks.
CriteriaConformance levelRemarks and explanations
1.2.6: Sign Language (Prerecorded)
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
1.2.7: Extended Audio Description (Prerecorded)
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
1.2.8: Media Alternative (Prerecorded)
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
1.2.9: Audio-only (Live)
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
1.3.6: Identify Purpose
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
1.4.6: Contrast (Enhanced)
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
1.4.7: Low or No Background Audio
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
1.4.8: Visual Presentation
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
1.4.9: Images of Text (No Exception)
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
2.1.3: Keyboard (No Exception)
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
2.2.3: No Timing
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
2.2.4: Interruptions
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
2.2.5: Re-authenticating
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
2.2.6: Timeouts
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
2.3.2: Three Flashes
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
2.3.3: Animation from Interactions
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
2.4.8: Location
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
2.4.9: Link Purpose (Link Only)
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
2.4.10: Section Headings
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
2.4.12: Focus Not Obscured (Enhanced)
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
2.4.13: Focus Appearance
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
2.5.5: Target Size (Enhanced)
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
2.5.6: Concurrent Input Mechanisms
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
3.1.3: Unusual Words
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
3.1.4: Abbreviations
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
3.1.5: Reading Level
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
3.1.6: Pronunciation
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
3.2.5: Change on Request
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
3.3.5: Help
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
3.3.6: Error Prevention (All)
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.
3.3.9: Accessible Authentication (Enhanced)
  • Web: Not Evaluated
  • Web:No remarks.

Back to report contents

Chapter 3: Functional Performance Criteria (FPC)

Chapter 3: Functional Performance Criteria (FPC) — conformance of Developer Tools. Each row lists a criterion, the conformance level, and remarks.
CriteriaConformance levelRemarks and explanations
302.1: Without Vision Does Not SupportOAuth 2.0 Authorization Server: major text is not read by a screen reader, so the product cannot be operated without vision. Developer Console: missing some aria-labels.
302.2: With Limited Vision Does Not SupportOAuth 2.0 Authorization Server: major text is not read by a screen reader, so the product cannot be operated with limited vision. Developer Console: some contrast issues.
302.3: Without Perception of Color Partially SupportsDeveloper Console: missing some visual focus indicators on buttons. OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server: color is not the main identifier of most elements, but it is for links.
302.4: Without Hearing SupportsNo remarks.
302.5: With Limited Hearing SupportsNo remarks.
302.6: Without Speech SupportsNo remarks.
302.7: With Limited Manipulation SupportsNo remarks.
302.8: With Limited Reach and Strength SupportsNo remarks.
302.9: With Limited Language, Cognitive, and Learning Abilities SupportsNo remarks.

Back to report contents

Chapter 4: Hardware

Developer Tools is a software product; Section 508 hardware criteria are not applicable.

This chapter is not included in this report.

Back to report contents

Chapter 5: Software

Chapter 5: Software — conformance of Developer Tools. Each row lists a criterion, the conformance level, and remarks.
CriteriaConformance levelRemarks and explanations
502.2.1: User Control of Accessibility Features Does Not SupportNo accessibility features are provided.
502.2.2: No Disruption of Accessibility Features SupportsNo remarks.
502.3.1: Object Information Partially SupportsMissing some ARIA tags.
502.3.2: Modification of Object Information Does Not SupportOAuth 2.0 Authorization Server: the radio button cannot be set programmatically. Developer Console: some controls, such as radio buttons, cannot be set.
502.3.3: Row, Column, and Headers Does Not SupportOAuth 2.0 Authorization Server: no row/column/header structure is exposed (no hierarchical structure). The Developer Console supports this criterion.
502.3.4: Values SupportsNo remarks.
502.3.5: Modification of Values SupportsNo remarks.
502.3.6: Label Relationships Partially SupportsDeveloper Console: some labels could be clearer. The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server supports label relationships.
502.3.7: Hierarchical Relationships Does Not SupportOAuth 2.0 Authorization Server: no hierarchical relationships are exposed. The Developer Console supports this criterion.
502.3.8: Text Does Not SupportOAuth 2.0 Authorization Server: major text is not read by a screen reader. Developer Console: some text, such as manifests and access keys, is not read aloud.
502.3.9: Modification of Text SupportsNo remarks.
502.3.10: List of Actions Does Not SupportThe list of available actions is not exposed to assistive technology.
502.3.11: Actions on Objects Does Not SupportAvailable actions on objects cannot be executed through assistive technology.
502.3.12: Focus Cursor Partially SupportsDeveloper Console: some inputs do not receive focus, such as radio buttons and copy/download buttons. The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server supports the focus cursor.
502.3.13: Modification of Focus Cursor Does Not SupportThe focus cursor cannot be programmatically modified.
502.3.14: Event Notification Partially SupportsDeveloper Console: some error messages are not read aloud. The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server has no notification features such as success/error messages or toasts.
502.4: Platform Accessibility Features Does Not SupportPlatform accessibility features are not supported.
503.2: User Preferences Does Not SupportUser preferences set at the platform level are not honored.
503.3: Alternative User Interfaces Does Not SupportDeveloper Console: alternative user interfaces are not supported. The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server rated this not applicable (no alternative user interface).
503.4.1: Caption Controls Not ApplicableNo caption controls.
503.4.2: Audio Description Controls Not ApplicableNo audio-description controls.
504.2: Content Creation or Editing Not EvaluatedNo remarks.
504.2.1: Preservation of Information Provided for Accessibility in Format Conversion Not ApplicableNo authoring tools involved.
504.2.2: PDF Export Not ApplicableNo authoring tools involved.
504.3: Prompts Not ApplicableNo authoring tools involved.
504.4: Templates Not ApplicableNo authoring tools involved.

Back to report contents

Chapter 6: Support Documentation and Services

Chapter 6: Support Documentation and Services — conformance of Developer Tools. Each row lists a criterion, the conformance level, and remarks.
CriteriaConformance levelRemarks and explanations
602.2: Accessibility and Compatibility Features Does Not SupportSupport documentation does not describe the product's accessibility and compatibility features.
602.3: Electronic Support Documentation Does Not SupportOAuth 2.0 Authorization Server: electronic support documentation does not meet WCAG 2.x (see the WCAG results).
602.4: Alternate Formats for Non-Electronic Support Documentation Does Not SupportDeveloper Console: alternate formats for non-electronic support documentation are not provided. The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server rated this not applicable because its documentation is available electronically.
603.2: Information on Accessibility and Compatibility Features Does Not SupportSupport services do not provide information on the product's accessibility and compatibility features.
603.3: Accommodation of Communication Needs Does Not SupportSupport services do not accommodate the communication needs of people with disabilities.

Back to report contents

Legal disclaimer: This Laserfiche® Accessibility Conformance Report is for informational purposes only and is subject to change without notice. Compulink Management Center, Inc. dba Laserfiche (“Laserfiche”) MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IN THIS DOCUMENT, and cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information presented after the date of publication. Laserfiche disclaims any liability with respect to this document and no contractual obligations are formed either directly or indirectly by this document. Customization of the product voids this conformance statement from Laserfiche. Customers may make independent conformance statements if they have conducted due diligence to meet all relevant requirements for their customization. Laserfiche further makes no representation concerning the ability of assistive technologies or other products to interoperate with its products. This document addresses the named product(s) only and not prerequisite products for which Laserfiche may supply restricted use licenses. Please consult with Assistive Technology (AT) vendors for compatibility specifications of specific AT products.

Back to the list of all reports